A Public Initiative

Artificial intelligence is a utility. Tax it like one.

Trillions of AI tokens flow through private infrastructure every day. They power healthcare, education, finance, and governance. We believe it's time for a public conversation about what that means for all of us.

Read the Manifesto Join the Coalition
7T+
Tokens processed daily
80%+
Of AI chips supplied by 1 company
0
Public oversight mechanisms

The Manifesto

We didn't vote
for this economy.

Every time you ask an AI a question, a token is born. It lives for milliseconds. It costs fractions of a cent. And it generates enormous value for the companies that control the pipes.

Tokens are the new kilowatt-hours. They power search results, medical diagnoses, legal research, financial models, creative work, and education. They're woven into the fabric of daily life. They are infrastructure.

We tax electricity. We tax water. We tax telecommunications. Why don't we tax the artificial intelligence layer?

This isn't about punishing innovation. It's about recognizing that when a technology becomes essential to how society functions, the public has a stake in how it's governed, priced, and distributed.

Today, a handful of companies control the world's intelligence supply. They set the prices. They choose who gets access. They decide what gets built. The rest of us just pay the meter and hope for the best.

We think there's a better way.

A token tax -- even a micro-levy -- could fund universal AI literacy programs, subsidize access for schools and hospitals, invest in open-source AI research, and create a public trust that ensures intelligence doesn't become a luxury good.

We know this idea is controversial. Good. The best ideas start as arguments.

We're not here to hand you a finished policy. We're here to force a question that nobody in power wants to answer: if AI intelligence is becoming as fundamental as electricity, who should benefit from it, and who should have a say?

The algorithm won't tax itself.

This is an invitation. To researchers, policymakers, technologists, educators, students, founders, union leaders, and anyone who uses AI -- which is increasingly everyone. Read the principles. Poke holes in them. Bring better ideas. Build coalitions we haven't imagined yet.

But don't sit this one out. The decisions being made right now about AI governance will shape the next century. You deserve a seat at that table.

Signed by the Tax the Tokens Coalition, 2026
Core Principles

What we stand for

Seven principles that guide our coalition. We hold these strongly and invite you to challenge every one of them.

01

Intelligence is Infrastructure

AI tokens power critical systems across healthcare, education, finance, and government. When something is this embedded in society, it's not a product. It's a utility.

02

Public Stake in Public Goods

AI was built on publicly funded research, public data, and public infrastructure. The public deserves a return on that investment through transparent governance and shared benefit.

03

Access Over Accumulation

Intelligence should not become a luxury good. A token tax could fund universal access programs, ensuring AI serves everyone, not just those who can afford the premium tier.

04

Innovation Needs Guardrails

Taxation isn't punishment. It's how societies invest in the commons. The internet thrived because of public investment. AI can too.

05

Global by Default

AI doesn't stop at borders. Neither should its governance. A token tax framework needs international coordination from day one, not as an afterthought.

06

Revenue for the Commons

Token tax revenue should fund AI literacy, open-source research, and subsidized access for schools, hospitals, and public institutions. Not general budgets. Directed investment.

07

This is a Debate, Not a Decree

We don't claim to have all the answers. We claim to have the right question. This movement exists to force the conversation and build it in public.

$4.8T
Projected AI market by 2030
80%+
Of AI chips from a single supplier
$0
Returned to the public commons
2.4B
People using AI daily
FAQ

Hard questions,
honest answers

Isn't this just anti-tech populism? +
No. This is pro-infrastructure realism. We're not against AI. We're for treating it with the same seriousness we give to other essential systems. Electricity companies aren't "anti-energy" because they're regulated. The same logic applies here.
Won't a token tax stifle innovation? +
The internet was built on publicly funded infrastructure and still became the most innovative platform in human history. A well-designed micro-levy wouldn't slow innovation. It would create a funding mechanism for the public goods that make innovation possible -- like AI literacy, open research, and equitable access.
Who would collect and manage this tax? +
That's exactly the kind of question this movement exists to answer. Options range from national regulatory bodies to international frameworks to public trusts. We're not prescribing a structure. We're demanding the conversation happen.
How much are we actually talking about? +
Even a fraction-of-a-cent levy per token, applied at scale, could generate billions annually for public benefit. Major AI providers process trillions of tokens every day. The math is significant even at micro-levels.
What about open-source AI? +
Open-source AI is a public good and should be treated as such. A well-designed framework would likely exempt or subsidize open-source compute, similar to how nonprofits receive tax benefits. The goal is to fund openness, not penalize it.
Is this a left-wing or right-wing idea? +
Neither. Utility regulation has bipartisan roots going back over a century. Conservatives who oppose monopoly power and progressives who support public investment can find common ground here. This is about whether critical infrastructure should be governed in the public interest. That's not partisan. That's foundational.
What if AI companies just move offshore? +
This is a real challenge, which is why international coalition-building matters. But AI companies need data centers near their users, access to talent, and functioning legal systems. The same "they'll just leave" argument was made about every industry that was eventually regulated. Most stayed.
I disagree with this. Can I still participate? +
Absolutely. We need skeptics as much as we need advocates. The whole point is to force a public debate that isn't happening yet. If you think a token tax is a bad idea, join the conversation and tell us why. The worst outcome isn't disagreement. It's silence.
Join the Coalition

This doesn't work without you

Whether you're a policymaker, a researcher, a student, or someone who just uses AI every day. Your voice matters in this conversation.

Policymakers Researchers Technologists Educators Journalists Organizers Founders Students Citizens
For Press & Partners

Media kit

Spread the Word

Social toolkit

Pre-written posts you can copy, paste, and personalize.

The algorithm won't
tax itself.

Join researchers, policymakers, technologists, and citizens demanding a public conversation about AI governance.

Join the Coalition Donate